Potter & Somerton - Chapter 6: Entropy
Following on the Second Law developed in Chapter 5 we consider the Clausius
Inequality leading to the definition of a new property Entropy
(s) and the Increase in Entropy
Principle. Various methods are developed to evaluate the change of entropy (Ds),
and this enables us to evaluate the "isentropic" efficiency
of various components, in particular turbines, compressors, and
nozzles. The entire chapter is required reading, and we go over
all the important derivations in class. Section 6.4 (Ideal Gas
with Variable Specific Heats) is important for evaluating systems
with large temperature variations such as the Diesel cycle engine.
We present an alternative approach to that of Potter by using
a table of Specific Heat
Capacities of Air. We also include an Entropy
Summary Sheet, an Isentropic
Processes Summary Sheet, and an Adiabatic
Efficiency Summary Sheet of all the relevant equations pertaining
to this section, for convenience.
Section 6.5 mentions the two property diagrams
involving entropy, the temperature-entropy (T-s) and enthalpy-entropy
(h-s) "Mollier" diagrams. We will find that the
h-s diagram is extremely useful for evaluating adiabatic
turbines and compressors, and complements the P-h diagram
which we used in Chapter 4 to evaluate entire steam power plants
or refrigerator systems. The h-s diagram for steam is presented
below:

Recommended Supplementary Problems for this
section - as many as possible of the following SI problems 6.25
through 6.69 - at least one from each group. (All answers to the
Supplementary Problems are given at the end of the chapter)
- Isentropic process -
- Ideal gas: 6.25, 6.26, 6.37, 6.38.
- Steam: 6.42.
- Rigid container -
- Ideal gas: 6.27, 6.34, 6.35, 6.54.
- Insulated, ruptured membrane (see Example
6.7): 6.33 (Note - in
problem 6.33 the initial temperature (not specified) is 20°C)
- Steam: 6.56
- Piston-cylinder -
- Ideal gas: 6.29, 6.30, 6.31. (Note - the only way that problem 6.30
can relate to the answer given is if the cylinder height is 20cm
(not 20mm) and the initial temperature 47°C (and not 27°C).
Even then the answer for work is incorrect. The correct answers
for 6.30 (air) are: work = 2.58 kJ, entropy change = 15.4 J/K)
- Steam: 6.39, 6.55
- Nozzle - 6.59
- Turbine -
- Gas: 6.60.
- Steam: 6.62, 6.63, 6.64 (Note - I was wrong! The turbine in 6.64 is NOT
adiabatic, thus the correct answer is as presented by Potter
- hT
= 39.9%. The main reason
for my confusion is that one does not normally associate an adiabatic
efficiency with a non-adiabatic turbine, and I will certainly
not do so in any quiz. On evaluating the heat flow we find that
a significant amount of heat is added to the system (1.44
MW) - this is totally unrealistic, since one normally expects
a heat loss.
- Otto cycle 6.66, Diesel cycle 6.69 (Correct answer for problem 6.69 is
55%)
- Rankine cycle 6.67 - this is an important
problem, however it is confusing as worded, and the associated
T-s diagram in Potter (Fig 6-20) is incorrect (can you see
why?) We reword the problem as follows:
Assuming that the turbine process is isentropic, calculate the
efficiency of the Rankine cycle shown, if P4 = 20kPa, P1 = P2 = 4MPa, and T2
= 600°C. Draw the complete cycle on a P-h diagram clearly indicating all 4 processes. The Rankine cycle
(as described) is shown schematically as follows:

We augment problem 6.67 as follows: Consider again the above
steamplant schematic, in which the (ideal) isentropic turbine
is replaced by an actual adiabatic turbine such that the outlet
at Station (3) is now 20 kPa, 150°C.
- a) Augment the P-h diagram plot above
with the actual turbine process.
- b) Using the steam tables calculate the thermal
efficiency of this cycle using the actual turbine specific work
to replace the isentropic turbine specific work. [hth = 26%]
- c) Plot both the actual and the isentropic
turbine processes (2)-(3) on the enthalpy-entropy h-s
"Mollier" diagram above. Indicate the specific work
done by both the actual and isentropic turbines on the h-s
diagram.
- d) Using the steam tables determine the actual
turbine adiabatic efficiency (hT) [72%]
- Additional
Problem 6.1 - Rankine Cycle Steam
Power Plant for Athens, Ohio
Once again we were surprised that no problems
were presented involving refrigeration and heat pump systems using
R134a refrigerant, or complete gas turbine systems such as those
used in aircraft jet engines. Thus we augment the above problem
set with additional problems to fill in this gap, in particular
making use of h-s diagrams. We have also provided an R134a enthalpy-entopy
(h-s) diagram which we find
useful for evaluating adiabatic compressors that are normally
found in refrigeration, air-condition and heat pump systems. We
will also extend the h-s diagram into the ideal gas region
and use it to advantage when we consider jet engine systems.
- Additional Problem 6.2 - Recall in Chapter 4b
that we provided Additional
Problems 4.1 & 4.2 concerning a home refrigerator, and
examining it's performance before and after adding an internal
heat exchanger. We wish to augment the problem statement with
the following additional requirements:
- a) Consider the case of replacing the actual
adiabatic compressor with an isentropic compressor, and augment
the P-h diagram drawn to include this change.
- b) Using the R134a tables determine the specific
work done on the isentropic compressor, and determine the new
Coefficient of Performance (COPR)
of the system both with and without the internal heat exchanger.
- c) Plot the actual and the isentropic compressor
processes on the enthalpy-entropy (h-s) diagram provided, for both cases - with and without the internal
heat exchanger.
- d) Using the R134a tables determine the actual
compressor adiabatic efficiency for both cases (hC).
- Additional Problem 6.3 - Recall in Chapter 4b that we provided Additional
Problem 4.4 concerning an innovative home air conditioner
and hot water heating system, in which we determined the COP
for both the air conditioning and the water heating systems.
Do sections a) through d) specified in Additional Problem 6.2
above on the compressor of this home air conditioning system.
We take a somewhat simpler approach for liquids
in that we consider them to be incompressible. This leads us to
Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines
There are many different forms and modifications
of aircraft gas turbine engines, and in this course we discuss
two variants - the ideal turbojet engine, and the gas turbine
engine for usage in helicopters.

The ideal turbojet engine shown schematically
in the above figure comprises the series connection of five components
- diffuser, compressor, combustor, turbine, and nozzle. The analysis
of the complete system, is best done in terms of the h-s
(enthalpy-entropy) diagram, which we will develop in class. Throughout
the system we assume that the fluid is pure air, and the combustors
are considered to be constant-pressure heat-addition devices.
Notice that the sole purpose of the turbine is to drive the compressor,
the nozzle providing the final kinetic energy increase to drive
the aircraft.
The gas turbine engine for usage in helicopters
is shown below:

In this case we see that there is no diffuser
or nozzle, and that the turbine section has been replaced by two
independent turbines - a "gassifier" turbine to drive
the compressor, and an output turbine to drive the helicopter
blades. A typical gas turbine engine of this type is the General
Electric T700 engine shown below, which is used in the Army Black Hawk helicopter.


Dr.
Tom Scott of the Industrial Technology
department, who previously worked in the Allison Gas Turbines
company on gas turbine engines (now Rolls Royce Allison), has
a fullsize cutaway model
of a T700 engine which he will demonstrate and discuss with us
in one of our classes.
This leads us to:
- Additional
Problem 6.5, in which we wish
to do a thermodynamic analysis of the General Electric T700 Gas
Turbine Engine