Ohio University Mechanical Engineering Sr. Design 2007-2008

Project: NISH (National Institute for the Severely Handicapped) National Scholar Competition for Workplace Innovation and Design

Info on the 6 Design Teams

 

Background on the Project

 

Project Selection Info

 

NISH (National Institute for the Severely Handicapped) webpage

Guidelines for the 2008 National Scholar Competition for Workplace Innovation and Design

 

Select Design Reports and Presentations

 

> Halliday's Heroes Design Report    (11/07)                                                  > MeToo Design Report (11/07)

> HH Design Decision Presentation (2/08)                                                     > MeToo Design Decision Presentation (2/08)

> HH Final Report: PROSTHETIC ARM FORCE REDUCER (6/08)           > MeToo Final Report: LIFT ASSIST DEVICE (6/08)

> HH NISH Summary: PROSTHETIC ARM FORCE REDUCER (6/08)      > MeToo NISH Summary: LIFT ASSIST DEVICE (6/08)

                                                           

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Superior Student Solutions Design Report (11/07)                    > Team ABP Conceptual Design Report (11/07)
> SSS Design Decision Presentation
(2/08)                                  > ABP Design Decision Presentation (2/08)

> SSS Final Report: PULL-PULL CABLE SAW SYSTEM          > ABP Final Report: PLASTIC TAB DISTRIBUTING DEVICE (6/08)

    FOR CARDBOARD CUTTING (6/08)

> SSS NISH Summary: PULL-PULL CABLE SAW                     > ABP NISH Summary: PLASTIC TAB DISTRIBUTING DEVICE (6/08)

   SYSTEM FOR CARDBOARD CUTTING (6/08)

                                                                           

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------                                           

> Stocker Center Street Gang Design Report (11/07)                      > Team Redundancy Team Design Report (11/07) 

> SCSG Design Decision Presentation (2/08)                                  > TRT Design Decision Presentation (Feb '08)

> SCSG Final Report: TORQUE-ASSIST WHEELCHAIR (6/08)    > TRT Final Report: BALLPOINT PEN ASSEMBLY JIG (6/08)

> SCSG NISH Summary: TORQUE-ASSIST W-CHAIR (6/08)         > TRT NISH Summary: BALLPOINT PEN ASSEMBLY JIG (6/08)

                                                                       

 

 

Video / Slideshow of Customer Demo Day  (55 MB wmv file)

 

Other Info about the SrD course:

The capstone design experience is truly an integrative learning experience for our students, where they apply many of the skills they have developed over their academic careers and also (we hope) make the connection between learning and life.  The context in which engineers work is extremely important, so we put a lot of emphasis on selecting an important problem to work on and on developing appropriate solutions that can truly benefit individuals and society. 

Another important aspect of the capstone experience is the emphasis on teamwork and professional skills.  Students often work in groups for labs and class projects, but in this class we focus on how to work effectively in teams, and for many students this is the first time they find themselves in a situation in which the project is so complex that they cannot succeed without contributions from all team members.  So they are forced to find ways to work together, to listen to each other, to communicate with each other, and to make good decisions based on consensus.  Through experience they come to realize the importance of non-technical characteristics such as leadership, organization, integrity, patience, initiative, dedication, resourcefulness, humility, and being a team player.

In "learning" design, there is no substitute for actually building and testing a "paper design" and having to deal with the manufacturing issues caused by your design decisions.  The students learn many lessons by building and testing the prototypes that can never be learned in a classroom.  They usually go through a period of frustration in which it looks like they won't be able to complete their projects, to a period of great pride when they pull together as a team and overcome all of the issues and produce a prototype that actually does what it is supposed to do.

Instructor Comments: The role of the instructor of the class changes significantly over the course of the year.  Since the purpose of the class is to help the students make the transition from being students to being engineers, my role is to put myself out of a job.  In other words, early in the year I try to help the students develop a better understanding of what it means to be a "good engineer", and to encourage them to act like professional engineers and to justify all of their decisions.  As the year progresses we continue to focus on teamwork issues and other professional skills since we are not only interested in "how to do engineering" but "how to be an engineer".  As the year progresses the most satisfying thing for me is to see myself become unnecessary.  When the students get to the point where instead of looking for someone to tell them what to do they are making good decisions on their own and confidently defending them, I know they have begun to see themselves as engineers, and their transition from student to engineer is complete.

·       Team Formation activities and Conceptual Design Activities – Fall 07

·       Design Refinement Activities – Winter 08

·       Prototype Construction and Testing and Final Design – Spring 08