OU ME
SrD Performance Review (Winter 2007):
1. Peer review of team
member's skills and contributions:
·
For each team member you are reviewing, identify several strengths and
several learning needs based primarily on the professional
skills assessment form. Report a
specific rating for each item, and provide some specific example that
demonstrates why you chose that rating.
A rating sheet and the full descriptions of the professional skills are
posted on the course calendar (March 5th).
·
Also, please
include an overall rating for each team
member you are reviewing that encompasses their contribution to the team and
the project this quarter. [Rating scale:
1 = unacceptable, 2-3 = underperforms, 4 - 6 = average performance, 7-9 =
superior performance]
·
Your ratings
will be considered along with those of the other team members and verbally
shared with the respective team members, but your confidentiality will be
preserved.
·
Submit these
ASAP, but no later than Monday 3/5 at 7AM.
2. Performance Review - Self evaluation:
·
Assess yourself using the professional skills assessment form. Report
a specific rating for each skill, and provide some specific example that
demonstrates why you chose that development level for your rating.
·
For example,
describe a situation in which you facilitated communication and it went well,
or a situation in which you were willing to call a 'safety stand-down' in order
to avoid a potentially dangerous decision or action,...or a situation where
poor planning led to schedule delays, or relying on your own skills without
allowing for review of your work led to errors in a report or
presentation,...].
·
The most important thing in this review is being
honest and identifying meaningful examples - your individual grade is not
increased by the level of your self rating. Dishonest ratings are an integrity violation.
·
If some items do not apply, indicate so.
·
Create a short
"To Be" list. (Similar to a
"to do" list, a "to be" list focuses on attitudes and
behaviors related to the professional skills that you will work on improving
over the next few months. For example: I
will be more sensitive to the feelings of others by getting to know how
"Joe" communicates non-verbally, monitoring his reactions during
meetings and project work, and talking to him about their feelings and
perspectives so he can feel more a part of the team and make more
contributions."
·
Submit these ASAP,
but no later than Monday 3/5 at 7AM.
Performance review meetings:
·
The 10 minute
performance review meetings will include a review of your peers' evaluations of
your performance (to clear up any misperceptions) as well as a discussion of
your self evaluation report.
·
You will be
asked to talk about skills that you developed this quarter (reference last
quarter's reflection report for your improvement project) and to identify your current development needs how
you plan to achieve the needed development.
·
Optional
additional material to bring to the meeting:
o
A summary list
of accomplishments this quarter
o
Design notebook
or other evidence of your contributions
o
Suggestions for
improving the performance review process
· We will approach the performance reviews as a two-way process in which the manager shares responsibility for the employee’s performance with the employee. Our goal is to improve together.
Evaluation/Grading Notes:
·
Grades for the
peer ratings and the reports will be based on perceived level of effort and
adherence to guidelines (are specific examples included?,
etc.).
·
Peer rating info
will be considered in assigning individual grades
·
Grades for the
performance review meeting will be based on how you are able to defend your
overall performance and provide examples
of past and future professional skills development plans.